Pierre Poilievre Makes Energy Pitch to Former US President Donald Trump in Promising Deal

no0103poilievre

A Great Deal for Both Countries?

Since winning the Canadian election, Pierre Poilievre has been making headlines with his bold promises to boost Canada’s economy and strengthen its relationship with the United States. One of his key strategies is to increase energy exports to the US, which he believes will not only benefit both countries but also address concerns about trade deficits.

In an interview with Bloomberg, Poilievre emphasized that a Conservative government would prioritize energy exports as a way to create jobs and stimulate economic growth in both Canada and the US. He pointed out that the current trade surplus between the two countries is driven by the sale of commodities like oil and gas that Canada has in abundance.

The Pathetic Story of Our Trade Surplus

According to Poilievre, the fact that Canada’s energy resources are being sold at a discount to the US is not just a problem for Canada but also a missed opportunity. He argued that by ramping up extraction of these resources and exporting them to the US, both countries can benefit from increased economic growth and job creation.

Poilievre acknowledged that this approach may require some changes in policies and regulations to facilitate faster project approvals and increase investment in energy production. However, he is confident that a Conservative government would be able to make these adjustments while also ensuring that Canadian resources are being used to their full potential.

A New Approach to Trade

Poilievre’s proposal to boost energy exports to the US has sparked debate among economists and trade experts. Some have argued that this approach may not address the root causes of trade imbalances between the two countries, while others see it as a more effective way to create jobs and stimulate economic growth.

In any case, Poilievre is convinced that his proposal offers a "great deal" for both Canada and the US. By prioritizing energy exports, he believes that a Conservative government can help address concerns about trade deficits while also creating new opportunities for job creation and economic growth in both countries.

A Keystone XL Revival?

One of Poilievre’s key proposals is to revive the Keystone XL pipeline project, which was effectively killed by President Joe Biden after taking office in 2021. While there has been no sign yet that South Bow Corp., owner of the Keystone system, would want to revive it, Poilievre believes that this project could still be revived if a Conservative government were to take office.

He argued that the pipeline would not only create jobs and stimulate economic growth but also help address concerns about energy security in both countries. By exporting more Canadian oil and gas to the US, Poilievre believes that Canada can help reduce its reliance on foreign supplies while also creating new opportunities for job creation and economic growth.

A More Robust Military and Continental Defence

Poilievre’s proposal to boost energy exports to the US is part of a broader strategy to strengthen Canada’s relationship with its southern neighbor. He has pledged to address concerns about border trafficking and military spending, which he believes are essential for maintaining good relations between the two countries.

By investing in Arctic security and continental defence, Poilievre believes that a Conservative government can help create new opportunities for job creation and economic growth while also addressing concerns about national security.

In conclusion, Pierre Poilievre’s proposal to boost energy exports to the US offers a "great deal" for both Canada and the US. By prioritizing energy production and export, he believes that a Conservative government can help address concerns about trade deficits while creating new opportunities for job creation and economic growth in both countries.

Share Your Thoughts

What do you think of Poilievre’s proposal to boost energy exports to the US? Do you believe this approach will help create jobs and stimulate economic growth in both countries, or is it a flawed strategy that may not address the root causes of trade imbalances between the two nations?

Join the conversation by sharing your thoughts in the comments below.


Trending Stories

  • "What are you complaining about?": Economists assail Trump’s Canada trade claims
  • Don’t count on Bank of Canada to bail out economy if tariffs imposed, economists say
  • History is foreshadowing the worst of times for markets