Apple requires Patreon to switch to its payment system or risk disqualification from the App Store.

patreon logo v1

Apple has signaled its intent to remove creator platform Patreon from the App Store if creators choose to use unsupported third-party billing options or disable transactions on iOS devices, opting instead to use Apple’s native in-app purchasing system for Patreon subscriptions. This move follows a blog post and email sent to Patreon creators regarding upcoming changes to membership management within the iOS app.

The company outlined its migration plan in a 16-month timeline, aiming to transition all creators to Apple’s iOS in-app purchase system by November 2025. Starting in November 2024, Patreon will shift memberships to subscription billing, with creators able to decide whether to cover Apple’s transaction fees or absorb them directly. This decision could significantly impact Patreon’s revenue model and creator monetization strategies.

Apple’s stance on the App Store policy framework has long been polarizing, with critics arguing that it stifles competition and forces smaller platforms like Patreon into compliance at the risk of stifling innovation. Proponents, however, view Apple’s approach as a necessary regulatory step to maintain control over its ecosystem and ensure creators receive fair compensation for their work.

This shift comes amid growing scrutiny of Apple’s App Store policies following similar moves by other major platform companies. The situation with Patreon highlights ongoing tensions within the digital content creation community, particularly regarding creator rights, monetization, and platform support.


Background on Apple’s App Store Policies

Apple’s App Store policy framework has been a subject of intense debate for years. First introduced in 2013, these policies dictate how third-party apps can charge users within the iOS ecosystem. They include rules regarding transaction fees, tax collection, and the requirement for apps to make a minimum percentage of sales available directly to consumers.

Apple enforces these policies through its App Store Review process, which vet submissions based on content guidelines. While some creators welcome the platform’s control over their revenue streams, others view it as an overly restrictive environment that hinders innovation and competition.

In 2017, Apple introduced its in-app purchase system for creator platforms like Patreon, allowing users to subscribe directly within the app rather than visiting a separate website. This move was controversial, with some critics arguing that it eliminated creators’ ability to monetize independently while others praised it as a step toward greater transparency and control over creator earnings.


The Impact on Patreon

Patreon has been a significant supporter of independent creators for years, offering platforms like YouTube, Twitch, and TikTok hosts the ability to generate substantial income through subscriptions. However, Apple’s decision to phase out third-party billing could have far-reaching consequences for the platform.

If adopted, the move would align Patreon with Apple’s in-house purchasing system, potentially simplifying transactions for users but also restricting creators’ options. Some creators argue that this change will lead to higher subscription fees and less flexibility in managing their income streams.

The decision is likely to spark widespread debate within the creator community, with some opting to continue using Patreon despite potential changes, while others may consider alternative platforms that align more closely with their needs.


Legal and Regulatory Context

Apple’s actions have drawn criticism from both sides of the digital content creation spectrum. Supporters argue that the company is acting in its own interest by ensuring creators receive fair compensation for their work. Critics, however, see it as an overreach of regulatory power that limits creator autonomy and stifles competition.

The situation with Patreon highlights the delicate balance between maintaining a stable ecosystem and protecting creator rights. AsApple continues to evolve its App Store policies, the future of platforms like Patreon hinges on how well they can adapt to these changes while preserving their unique value proposition.


Conclusion

Apple’s decision to potentially remove Patreon from the App Store marks an important moment in the ongoing evolution of creator ecosystems. While some creators may welcome the change as a step toward greater control, others fear it could have detrimental effects on their ability to generate income and compete with other platforms.

As the debate over Apple’s App Store policies continues, one thing is clear: the relationship between Apple and creator platforms like Patreon will likely remain a key area of discussion for years to come.